| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:51 am Post subject: Sjedinjene Socijalističke Američke Države |
|
|
Sjedinjene Socijalističke Američke Države - Dolar, Patriotizam i Socijalizam na Američki Način
Jedan običan, bezvrijedan komad papira drži u šaci cijeli svijet.
Novčanica Federalnih Rezervi se bori sa velikim problemima u cijelom svijetu.
Nitko se više ne sjeća na šta je ličio internet do prije samo mjesec dana?
Svi su zaboravili da je bio preplavljen tekstovima o korupciji, prevari Federalnih Rezervi, bezvrijednoj novčanici Federalnih Rezervi kreiranoj iz ničega?
Svi su pljuvali po Američkom monetarnom sistemu!
Pa gdje su nestali svi ti patrioti?
Da pokušamo odgonetnuti?
Za sada, još nisu završili u Crom Time Banci.
Pa gdje su onda zbilja, svi nestali?
Malte ne, svaki je artikl bio potpisan: "Kupujte zlato kao zaštitu od nadolazećeg kolapsa i inflacijskog pakla"!
U sistemu u kojem živimo, a baš su autori svih tih tekstova najbolje to znali, i cijena zlata je manipulirana.
U stvari, svaki skok cijene zlata ispod desetak hiljada dolara po unci, po meni je neuspjeh.
Ha, ha, ha, cijena zlata nije niti 900 dolara, ha, ha, ha.
Ma nije ovo uopće smiješno, ali je bilo lako za predvidjeti i ovako nešto očekivati od sistema koji kontrolira svaki ugao naših života.
Kako se uvidjelo da je situacija zbilja totalna kriza, i da je zlatna nada propala, tako je i dolar Američkim patriotima postao ponovo dobar.
Kradu im zemlju ispred očiju, navaljuju ogromne nove dugove na već posrnula pleća pod teretom svemirskih zaduženja, baš kao što smo to imali prilike gledati na području bivše Jugoslavije.
Hej Ameriko, dobrodošla među zemlje Trećeg Svijeta!
Iako se ne dešava baš često da super sila koja je na čelu Svjetske Banke i Međunarodnog Monetarnog Fonda, zbog prevare završava u očajničkim molitvama za milost, nigdje niti jednog znaka protesta!?!
Nitko nigdje nije izašao na ulice, nitko nigdje nikoga niti nije pozvao na ulice, ha, ha, ha!?!
Usred financijskog kolapsa, odobrene su nove, rekordne stotine milijardi za ratni budžet nove 2009 godine.
I nitko, baš nitko da došapne ratnom zločincu, Predsjedniku Bushu da bi možda bilo najbolje da nova zemlja koju treba napasti i osvojiti, budu Kajmanska Ostrva.
Pa tamo je završio sav ukradeni novac, to bi bio najbolji potez Američkih patriota i revolucionara u povijesti Sjedinjenih Američkih Država.
Problem je međutim religiozne naravi.
Naime, nema jednog jedinog ustava bilo koje zemlje koja u savezu sa ostalim zemljama čini Sjedinjene Američkie Države, a da se u njemu ne spominje bog.
Kajmansko Otočje je već okupirano.
Ove je otoke već par godina okupirao Vatikan.
Krasti po cijelom svijetu se naravno može, ali ići na Kajmanske Otoke više nije dopušteno.
I tako su Amerikanci u samo par dana, prešli sa kapitalističkog na socijalističko društveno uređenje.
Kao i uvijek do sada, i ovdje su Amerikanci posebni, pa su smislili socijalizam na Američki način.
Nakon nacionalizacija bankarskih giganata u bankrotu, u Ujedinjenim Narodima se već spremaju na promjenu imena SAD u SSAD - Sjedinjene Socijalističke Američke Države.
Za razliku od ostalih socijalizama u svijetu, ovaj je socijalizam za bogataše, društvo sa Wall Streeta.
Profiti se privatiziraju, a gubitci nacionaliziraju.
Osim posljedica, i cijeli je mađioničarski trik plaćen novcem poreznih obveznika, a da ih nitko nije pitao za dozvolu.
Sve su te krađe, manipulacije, bankroti, privatizacije i nacionalizacije plaćene ignorancijom hipnotiziranog i potlačenog, Američkog naroda.
Kako je cifra koju još treba ukrasti ogromna, stara Vlada novih Sjedinjenih Socijalističkih Američkih Država je najavila nove poteze, nova spašavanja, nove monetarne inekcije i nove nacionalizacije.
Ovo je nakon osnivanja komunističkog Sovjetskog Saveza i komunističke Kine, najveći socijalistički događaj u povijesti.
Na ovaj način, sav ostali kapitalistički svijet, a svi smo postali kapitalisti zar ne, može slobodno i bez straha, bez ikakvog rizika investirati u novi dug Sjedinjenih Socijalističkih Američkih Država.
Zarada na kamatama je ipak važnija od vraćanja glavnice.
Uostalom, koga je uopće briga ako i sama zarada na kamatama, zahvaljujući inflaciji u stvari predstavlja gubitak.
Najmanje se o tome brine radno stanovništvo cijele planete, koje je i tako dobrovoljno pristalo na uništavanje plodova i rezultata njihovog znoja i rada.
Cijela je ova priča postala prava pravcata svetinja, u koju se nitko ne usuđuje dirati.
Drugovi Bush, Paulson i Bernanke će ući u povijesne enciklopedije kao trojka boljševika koja je pretvorila SAD u SSAD.
Kako bi se sve uklopilo u podmazani mehanizam koji savršeno funkcionira već stoljećima, neki su dan kapitalistička Kina, a jučer 20. Rujna 2008 i kapitalistička Rusija pozvali na novi svjetski poredak.
Ovaj bi se novi poredak trebao bazirati na novoj ekonomsko - financijskoj situaciji, novoj arhitekturi internacionalnog monetarnog sustava koji nesmije imati svoje temelje izgrađene na štamparskoj presi.
Novi poredak naravno ne bi smio biti izložen stalnim rizicima, izjavio je Putin nakon susreta Rusko - Francuske bilaterale komisije za suradnju.
Francuski prvi ministar, Francois Fillon je pak rekao da će zajednički raditi na tome sljedećih par tjedana.
Nevjerovatno ali istinito, Francuska, kako je to objavio Thierry Meyssan, ima za predsjednika agenta CIA-e.
Sarkozy-ev pak brat, Olivier Sarkozy radi za Carlyle, ozloglašeni investicijski fond bivših predsjednika, u kojemu su skupa i Bush i obitelj Laden.
Nije poznato, ali izgleda da je baš iz ovih razloga, predsjednik jedne od jedine tri zemlje u kojima je proveden narodni referendum za Europski Ustav, i gdje je narod jasno i glasno rekao i odlučio ne, po čemu bi Irska trebala postati veliki prijatelj Francuskog naroda, Nicolas Sarkozy toliko napada tu zemlju čija je odluka u stvari i formalna propast eksperimenta zvanog Europska Unija.
Slučajno ili ne, i Europska centralna banka je kao i Federalne Rezerve privatna institucija koja u Uniji koja je od svog postanka bez najvažnijeg zakona i dokumenta, Ustava.
Slučajno ili ne, umjesto da bankrotom Amerike profitira, Europska Unija se nalazi možda i u dubljoj i većoj krizi od same Amerike.
Po procjenama Europske centralne banke, na računu je ostalo 1000 eura po stanovniku.
Zbog frakcijske rezerve odnosno frakcijskog bankarstva, kalkulirajući srednju vrijednost likvidnih depozita u bankama, svaki klijent koji podigne svoj novac iz banke, ostavit će ostalih 50 klijenata bez pet para.
Kada ovome pridodamo srednju vrijednost javnog i privatnog duga po glavi stanovnika Europske Unije, ...
Hej Europo, dobrodošla među Zemlje Trećeg Svijeta!
Tvoj dolazak među zemlje trećeg svijeta će trajati malo duže, i neće biti tako bezbolan.
Za početak, vjerovatno će tvoje ulice ličiti na one biciklističke piste Kine i Albanije, a periferije na onaj otpad automobila iz filma Mad Max.
No to je samo onaj dobar, manje lošiji dio cijele priče...
_________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: Najveća Pljačka u Povijesti |
|
|
Kada se ništa ne događa u Zimbabveu, onda je to stvar Zimbabvea.
Kada se ništa posebno ne događa u Poljskoj, onda je to Poljski problem.
Kada se nešto posebno dešava u zemlji čija privatna centralna banka izdaje papir koji cijelom svijetu služi za devizne rezerve i kupnju nafte, onda je to problem ljudske populacije i tiče se svakog živog stvorenja na ovoj planeti.
S obzirom da bez milijardi i milijardi posuđenih novaca iz inostranstva za svaki pojedinačni dan u godini, Amerika ne može preživjeti, domaći mediji izgleda da imaju pravo: ništa se posebno ne dešava osim najveće pljačke u povijesti čovječanstva!
Znate li da infrastrukture imaju potrebu za održavanjem? Procjenjuje se da treba između 1.5 i 3 triliona dolara za to.
Iz Američkog Ministarestva Odbrane je nestalo 3.3 triliona dolara, nestalo, nema ih, isparili kao da se radi o kovanici od jedne kune, a ne o planini novca.
Amerika ima i jedan problem koji vam nisu spomenuli.
Osim ogromnog stvaranja novog novca bez ikakve podloge, odnosno iz ničega, a koje samo po sebi izaziva veliku inflaciju, te pošto je dolar svjetska valuta - jedini Američki izvozni proizvod za cijeli svijet postaje infalcija, sve se više ljudi obraća državi za pomoć.
Da, da, dobro ste čuli, Amerika nije više ona sa televizije, što u stvarnosti nikada nije ni bila.
Kako je sve većem broju ljudi potrebna državna pomoć, tako će i država morati posuđivati sve veće količine novca, i evo inflacije do neba na svjetskom nivou.
Pa zašto je svim našim vladama preče pomaganje stranim privatnim bankama od domaćih građana koji se također nalaze u velikoj krizi?
Čovjek se normalno zapita pred prevarom ovolikih razmjera, da li uopće ima smisla nastaviti isplaćivati svoje lažne kredite?
Neoficijalno oficijalni dug Sjedinjenih Američkih Država iznosi oko 100 triliona dolara.
Onaj pak oficijalno neoficijalni dug iznosi 9.7 triliona dolara.
Komunističkim potezom šah-mat, oficijalno neoficijalni dug bi se u trenutku popeo na $11,315,000,000,000, odnosno 11.3 triliona dolara.
Ako ste porezni obveznik, sada ste htjeli to ili ne, postali i investitor u bankarsku, kreditnu i industriju osiguranja.
Ali niste u posjedu onog dobrog biznisa, u posjedu ste one najgore opcije: "Junk (smeće)" bondova.
Drugovi su organizirali najveće spašavanje privatne industrije u povijesti, koje nije niti izbliza pri kraju.
Umjesto da vaš novac ulože u profitabilan biznis, uložili su ga u firme u bankrotu.
I usred ove famozne orgije kojoj one iz starog Rima nisu ni do koljena, svi su zaboravili na Zemlje Trećeg Svijeta.
Iako se radi o relativno malim svotama kredita koje su za njih ogromne, i koje su, sada se ispostavilo u stvari lažne, nikome niti ne pada na pamet spomenuti nekakvo zaboravljanje i u njihovom slučaju.
Ha, ha, ha, i uz sve to, Amerika i dalje ima najveći mogući, najsigurniji kreditni rejting "AAA".
| Quote: | LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TREASURY AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE MORTGAGE-RELATED ASSETS
Section 1. Short Title.
This Act may be cited as ____________________.
Sec. 2. Purchases of Mortgage-Related Assets.
(a) Authority to Purchase.--The Secretary is authorized to purchase, and to make and fund commitments to purchase, on such terms and conditions as determined by the Secretary, mortgage-related assets from any financial institution having its headquarters in the United States.
(b) Necessary Actions.--The Secretary is authorized to take such actions as the Secretary deems necessary to carry out the authorities in this Act, including, without limitation:
(1) appointing such employees as may be required to carry out the authorities in this Act and defining their duties;
(2) entering into contracts, including contracts for services authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States Code, without regard to any other provision of law regarding public contracts;
(3) designating financial institutions as financial agents of the Government, and they shall perform all such reasonable duties related to this Act as financial agents of the Government as may be required of them;
(4) establishing vehicles that are authorized, subject to supervision by the Secretary, to purchase mortgage-related assets and issue obligations; and
(5) issuing such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to define terms or carry out the authorities of this Act.
Sec. 3. Considerations.
In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall take into consideration means for--
(1) providing stability or preventing disruption to the financial markets or banking system; and
(2) protecting the taxpayer.
Sec. 4. Reports to Congress.
Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by section 3.
Sec. 5. Rights; Management; Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.
(a) Exercise of Rights.--The Secretary may, at any time, exercise any rights received in connection with mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act.
(b) Management of Mortgage-Related Assets.--The Secretary shall have authority to manage mortgage-related assets purchased under this Act, including revenues and portfolio risks therefrom.
(c) Sale of Mortgage-Related Assets.--The Secretary may, at any time, upon terms and conditions and at prices determined by the Secretary, sell, or enter into securities loans, repurchase transactions or other financial transactions in regard to, any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act.
(d) Application of Sunset to Mortgage-Related Assets.--The authority of the Secretary to hold any mortgage-related asset purchased under this Act before the termination date in section 9, or to purchase or fund the purchase of a mortgage-related asset under a commitment entered into before the termination date in section 9, is not subject to the provisions of section 9.
Sec. 6. Maximum Amount of Authorized Purchases.
The Secretary’s authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time
Sec. 7. Funding.
For the purpose of the authorities granted in this Act, and for the costs of administering those authorities, the Secretary may use the proceeds of the sale of any securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of title 31, United States Code, are extended to include actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses. Any funds expended for actions authorized by this Act, including the payment of administrative expenses, shall be deemed appropriated at the time of such expenditure.
Sec. 8. Review.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency (il neretto e' di WSI).
Sec. 9. Termination of Authority.
The authorities under this Act, with the exception of authorities granted in sections 2(b)(5), 5 and 7, shall terminate two years from the date of enactment of this Act.
Sec. 10. Increase in Statutory Limit on the Public Debt.
Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu thereof $11,315,000,000,000.
Sec. 11. Credit Reform.
The costs of purchases of mortgage-related assets made under section 2(a) of this Act shall be determined as provided under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as applicable.
Sec. 12. Definitions.
For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Mortgage-Related Assets.--The term "mortgage-related assets" means residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008.
(2) Secretary.--The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Treasury.
(3) United States.--The term "United States" means the States, territories, and possessions of the United States and the District of Columbia. |
_________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News
Last edited by administrator on Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:00 am Post subject: CDS's Betting the U.S. Treasury Will Default |
|
|
| Quote: | CDS's Betting the U.S. Treasury Will Default
You've heard of "credit default swaps". They are a type of derivative where one person places a bet that a certain company will go out of business, and another person on the other side of the contract places a bet that the company won't go out of business (see this and this).
Well, people are now starting to increase their use of credit default swaps to bet that the U.S. will default on its ability to pay on its treasury debt. |
Financial crisis: Default by the US government is no longer unthinkable
Daily Telegraph, 21/09/2008
So, here we are - the start of a new world order. After the tumultuous events of the last fortnight, the global economic landscape will never look the same again.
The front page of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle newspaper on the day of the initial Wall Street Crash in 1929
Hard times: central banks have acted to avoid a repeat of 1929
Power has tangibly shifted - away from the United States and the Western world generally, and towards the fast-growing giants of the East. That's been happening for some years now.
But September 2008 marks the moment when the scale of our excesses, the extent of our debts and the moral bankruptcy of our financial regulatory system finally began to be truly exposed.
I say began to be exposed. Back in March, Standard and Poor's, the US ratings agency, estimated some $285bn (£156bn) of mortgage-backed securities would eventually be written-off by the global banking sector. On Friday, almost unnoticed amid the panic, that forecast was upped to $378bn.
In reality, total credit losses will be much higher - at least $750bn in my view. But the extent of the 33 per cent one-off increase in S&P's estimate speaks volumes. It reflects just how little anyone truly knows about either the ultimate size of the sub-prime losses or who ultimately holds the related securities.
But with one in ten US mortgages now "delinquent" or "in foreclosure", and house prices still falling, such "toxic waste" is burning holes in balance sheets wherever it sits. That's why this crisis is far from over.
It's difficult to overstate the enormity of what happened last week. By any standard, the collapse of Lehman Brothers was a dramatic - and alarming event. One of the biggest names on Wall Street, the 158-year old bank was consumed by the scale of its losses and crippled by executive feuds. Deemed by the US Federal Reserve to be "sufficiently unconnected" to the rest of the global financial system, Lehman was allowed to fold.
In contrast, American International Group, the world's largest insurer, was judged "too interconnected" to collapse. So the Fed effectively "nationalised" AIG - the biggest rescue of a private firm in human history. And it's only a few weeks, of course, since the even more expensive bail-out of quasi-government lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - which, between them, account for a mind-boggling $5,300bn of mortgages, around half of America's home loans.
On top of all that, US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson sent an $800bn financial rescue plan to Congress. He wants to create a second "Resolution Trust Corporation" - or government-owned asset management company - to take on illiquid mortgage-related debts. The original RTC was established to rescue the US Savings and Loans Associations that went bust in the 1980s.
And by the way, the Fed has also just offered another $125bn of liquidity to banks outside the US that are desperate for dollars and can't access America's frozen credit markets - a move co-ordinated with central banks in Japan, the Eurozone, Switzerland, Canada and here in the UK.
The combination of these measures - each of them of enormous significance in its own right - sent stock markets shooting-up on Friday. America's S&P 500 rose 4.03 per cent and London's FTSE 100 soared 8.84 per cent, its largest one-day rise ever. But, despite the end-of-week euphoria and trader-talk that "the only way is up", despite America's undoubted resolve and Paulson's determination to do "whatever it takes", the situation remains very fragile.
Nothing better reflects the amount of fear among banks in America - banks everywhere - than the sky-high rates they're continuing to charge when lending to each other. Ordinarily, inter-bank (or Libor) interest rates are only slightly above base rates. But with so much uncertainty remaining about the scale and occurrence of "sub-prime" - and with desperate bank executives still so reluctant to "fess-up" their losses - the US Libor rate on money to be paid back in three months is now a staggering 1.5 per cent above base. In recent weeks, Libor rates have shot up in other countries too.
Paulson's latest liquidity injection has lowered over-night Libor rates for now. But, despite the torrent of cash the US has directed at the credit markets, longer-term inter-bank rates have stayed stubbornly high, and some have gone up further. In other words, even the banks themselves don't think the rescue plan will work. Expect more - and bigger - liquidity operations in weeks to come.
The trouble is, though, as the bill for these bail-outs keeps rising, so does the possibility that the political consensus will crack and there'll be an almighty, and debilitating, dust-up. Paulson's RTC plan, in theory, could restore confidence. By taking sub-prime loans off banks' books, it could de-ice the inter-bank market, restoring credit lines to households and firms and preventing the "credit crunch" from shifting wholesale, in that fabled phrase, "from Wall Street to Main Street".
But, in the run-up to the US election in November, Democrats in Congress - and even some Republicans - may decide they're simply not having it. How much more can the US taxpayer take? It sounds insane, but the liabilities being taken on by the Fed and the US Treasury are now so enormous that the government itself could default. No?
Check out the chart showing the recent spikes in the US 10-year credit default swap. In other words, the market is now pricing-in the genuine possibility that the US will struggle to pay-back some of its long-term T-bills.
That possibility is still deemed to be quite low. But the ultimate financial question - until recently, unthinkable - is now being asked. Yes siree, the mighty US government could default. That's how much the world has changed. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:57 am Post subject: The Biggest Robbery Attempt in History |
|
|
The Biggest Robbery Attempt in History
| Quote: | Definition of Incredible
So extraordinary as to seem impossible.
Definition of Robbery
The act or an instance of unlawfully taking the property of another by the use of violence or intimidation.
Definition of Demonstration
A public display of group opinion, as by a rally or march.
Definition of Protest
- A formal declaration of disapproval or objection issued by a concerned person, group, or organization.
- A formal statement drawn up by a notary for a creditor declaring that the debtor has refused to accept or honor a bill.
- A formal declaration made by a taxpayer stating that the tax demanded is illegal or excessive and reserving the right to contest it.
|
Exclusive: Foreign banks may get help
Politico, 9/21/08
In a change from the original proposal sent to Capitol Hill, foreign-based banks with big U.S. operations could qualify for the Treasury Department’s mortgage bailout, according to the fine print of an administration statement Saturday night.
The theory, according to a participant in the negotiations, is that if the goal is to solve a liquidity crisis, it makes no sense to exclude banks that do a lot of lending in the United States.
The legislative outline that went to Capitol Hill at 1:30 a.m. Saturday had said that an eligible financial institution had to have has “its headquarters in the United States.” That would exclude foreign-based institutions with big U.S. operations, such as Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland and UBS. The theory, according to a participant in the negotiations, is that if the goal is to solve a liquidity crisis, it makes no sense to exclude banks that do a lot of lending in the United States.
But a Treasury “Fact Sheet” released at 7:15 last night sought to give the administration more flexibility, with an expanded definition that could include all of those banks: “Participating financial institutions must have significant operations in the U.S., unless the Secretary makes a determination, in consultation with the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, that broader eligibility is necessary to effectively stabilize financial markets.”
The major change in the suggested eligibility requirements is the biggest change that Treasury publicly made after a day of briefings and conversations with Capitol Hill, and is likely the first of many.
Aspects of the $700 billion, two-year proposal that are still under negotiation include what, if anything, will be added to the administration’s simple but sweeping proposal. And the parliamentary route, such as what committees or hearings might be involved, has not been finalized.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) has a hearing scheduled for Wednesday that is likely to focus on the proposal.
Under what congressional officials called a likely scenario, the measure could go to the House floor on Thursday, with passage expected the same day.
The Senate could take the package up as soon as Friday and send it to President Bush for his signature, although the Senate schedule is less predictable and had not been determined.
Officials expect passage by huge margins in both chambers, since Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke have told congressional leaders the country’s financial stability depends on it.
House Democrats plan to insist on adding protections for homeowners facing foreclosure, and want to add measure to help homeowners facing bankruptcy, and an executive compensation restriction designed to prevent golden parachutes for the heads of troubled institutions.
Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who was supportive of the bailout concept in a statement released Friday, thinks that “whatever gets done in Congress has to protect Main Street,” senior adviser Stephanie Cutter said on MSNBC on Saturday. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject: The Biggest Robbery Attempt in History |
|
|
The Biggest Robbery Attempt in History
Paulson: Foreign banks can use U.S. rescue plan
Reuters, Sun Sep 21, 2008
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday that foreign banks will be able to unload bad financial assets under a $700 billion U.S. proposal aimed at restoring order during a devastating financial crisis.
"Yes, and they should. Because ... if a financial institution has business operations in the United States, hires people in the United States, if they are clogged with illiquid assets, they have the same impact on the American people as any other institution," Paulson said on ABC television's "This Week with George Stephanopolous."
Paulson was appearing on the Sunday television talk show circuit to provide details about the U.S. government plan for a sweeping bailout to mop up hundreds of billions of dollars in toxic mortgage debt.
The moves capped a week in which financial markets faced their most serious confluence of crises since the Great Depression in the 1930s and threatened national economies and the worldwide banking system.
Paulson defended the rescue package as painful and costly, but necessary to stabilize a financial system that has all but ground to a halt.
"The situation we had, where the markets are frozen and lending may not be available, is one that won't be good for the American people," he said.
"The fact that the taxpayer is in this position is painful to me."
Paulson acknowledged that an emergency rescue plan aimed at stabilizing a financial system in freefall will cost taxpayers money, but argued that costs will not be as high the $700 billion limit of the package.
"The taxpayer is at risk," he said on "Fox News Sunday" television program, but added, "It would be extraordinary circumstances, highly unlikely, that the cost will be anything like the amount you spend for the assets."
Paulson said the U.S. government is pressuring financial authorities in other countries to adopt similar financial stabilization plans.
"We have a global financial system and we are talking very aggressively with other countries around the world, and encouraging them to do similar things, and I believe a number of them will," he said.
Paulson said the sudden crisis was stunning but he expressed hope in U.S. economic resilience.
"I wouldn't bet against the long-term fundamentals of this country," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "But this is a humbling experience to see so much fragility in our capital markets, and ask how did we ever get here."
"I'm confident Congress will move and move quickly," Paulson he added. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:18 pm Post subject: Najveća Pljačka u Povijesti |
|
|
Najveća Pljačka u Povijesti
Nedjelja, 21.09.2008
U izmjeni originalnog zahtjeva upućenog Capitol Hill-u, strane banke koji imaju veliki promet povezan sa Sjedinjenim Socijalističkim Američkim Državama, moći će zatražiti uvrštenje na listu prisutnih u najvećem socijalističkom događaju u povijesti.
U teoriji, ako se već radi o spašavanju od globalne krize likvidnosti (bankrotu), nema smisla iz njega izostaviti strane banke koje posuđuju novac u Sjedinjenim Socijalističkim Američkim Državama.
Na ovoj listi bi se tako mogli naći Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS i ostalo društvo.
Čini se da je zahtjev nedugo poslije toga postao još fleksibilniji i nejasniji, i da bi se na listi mogla naći i druga imena, po potrebi, a da bi o svemu trebao odlučivati Državni Trezor u dogovoru sa Federalnim Rezervama.
Senator i kandidat Barack Obama, koji podržava koncept spašavanja, izjavio je da što god Kongres odlučio, to mora pomoći gnijezdu.
Sekretar Državnog Trezora Henry Paulson: Strane Banke Se Mogu Korisiti Američkim Planom Za Spašavanje
Strane će se banke moći riješiti svojih problema koristeći Američki plan za spašavanje od 700 milijardi dolara.
Sekretar je opisao i branio ovaj plan kao skup i bolan, ali potreban za stabilizaciju financijskog sistema koji ima sve, osim tla pod nogama.
Trenutna situacija u kojoj se nalazimo najvjerovatnije neće dopustiti nove zajmove, a to nije dobro za Amerikance.
Jako mi je žao poreznih obveznika, izjavio je Paulson.
Paulson je također priznao da će spašavanje privatnih banaka javnim novcem skupo koštati porezne obveznike, ali da to i neće baš biti cijena od 700 milijardi dolara.
Porezni obveznici riskiraju, rekao je za Fox News.
Dodao je da se ovaj plan mora brzo odobriti.
Rekao je i to da Američka Vlada vrši pritiske i na druge zemlje, koje bi trebale napraviti i koristiti se programima sličnim ovom Američkom.
Pošto se radi o globalnom problemu, Paulson se nada da će i ostale zemlje to prihvatiti.
| Quote: | VJERUJ MI I DAJ MI APSOLUTNU KONTROLU.
SVE ĆEMO MI VEĆ SREDITI.
I DA TI NIJE PALO NA PAMET, PRESTATI PLAĆATI RATE SVOG KREDITA I ZATRAŽITI UVRŠTENJE NA NAŠU LISTU!
NAIME, NAMA NISU POTREBNE MILIJARDE, NAMA SU POTRENI TRILIONI I TRILIONI!
Knjiga - G. Edward Griffin: Kreatura sa Jekyll Island-a
Godina - 1994
Pisac - G. Edward Griffin
The Creature From Jekyll Island. From Chapter Two, The Name of the Game is Bailout:
U prijašnjem poglavlju stoji da je grupa sa Jekyll Island-a, koja je osmislila Federalne Rezerve, u stvari stvorila nacionalni kartel u kojem dominiraju najveće banke.
Također, u prijašnjem poglavlju se tvrdi da je primarni cilj tog kartela upotrijebiti Vladu kao sredstvo za prebacivanje neizbježnih gubitaka, sa vlasnika tih banaka na porezne obveznike.
To će uraditi kroz objašnjenje da dužnik više nije u stanju isplaćivati dug, i da će bez intervencije Vlade Američki Narod pretrpjeti strašne posljedice.
Reći će narodu da ne samo da će zavladati nezaposlenost i oskudica, već će doći i do rascijepa na svjetskim tržištima...
Krajnji cilj u korist bankarskom kartelu je da imaju Vladine garancije za kredite koji neće moći biti isplaćeni u budućnosti.
Ovo će se provesti na način da se ubjedi Kongres, da ako se to ne uradi, rezultat će biti velika šteta za ekonomiju i oskudica za narod.
Od tog trenutka na dalje, teret duga je prebačen iz knjiga banaka na leđa poreznih obveznika... |
_________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News
Last edited by administrator on Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:59 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:13 am Post subject: Paulson's Blow Torch |
|
|
Paulson's Blow Torch
By Msgt Gunny, 9-21-8
A wider picture of the planned lender's bailout to be decided next week.
Treasury Secy Hank Paulson said the credit markets are "frozen" and "fragile right now." And, he predicts that unless government intervention prevails, the lending practice will only worsen, and likely create a huge recession, if not a depression.
So, he comes up with his blow torch. In an attempt to "melt" these frozen credit markets, so the public can go back out and get new credit, that business can secure loans to keep its operations running smoothly. In short, putting money back into circulation, thus circumventing a recession, or worse. Yet what he really is doing is propping up private lenders, in an effort to keep what he perceives from major banks crashing, including foreign banks with US interests.
Not much is said about the thousands of much smaller banks, and the grubstake they will receive as part of the blow torch plan. Currently there are about 8,200 US banks and credit unions; many experts predict that number will be cut in half in the coming months as the recession deepens (what recession, you say?) and these lenders go awash with other toxic mortgages and bad debt.
But to do all this, it will cost some $700 billion. Or there-abouts. Perhaps up to $1.5 trillion or more, to be self explained further down in this essay.
Paulson's plan is to purchase toxic mortgages and other derivates from the lenders to enable them to offer better lending. The plan would allow the lenders to move from a mostly insolvent position to being solvent once again, with its bad debts now "off the books."
The plan means the government would use these funds to purchase the bad debts at a "deep discount" and then attempt to sell off the debts through a "reverse auction process."
Only, nobody is giving any rationale about how the government will find buyers for these bad mortgages, most of which are foreclosed homes. So then, the government ends up owning millions of homes, which have to be maintained, insured and taxes paid on them.
Do you see the $700 billion now starting to grow?
Add to this mix, the many Wall Street so-called "experts" which will have to be brought into the Treasury to help administer not only the banker bailouts, but to provide the input in an attempt to smooth out the untold wrinkles of the plan. Likely the very same "creatures" who got us into this mess.
So how does the government actually get rid of these homes? Oh, right, get Congress to recognize it now has a new problem, with millions of homes on its hands (likely to be administered through HUD), and needs legislation NOW allowing FHA insured mortgages to be instituted through the lenders which it has now declared solvent.
After-all, did the PLAN really expect that investors would continue to purchase toxic mortgages and other bad debts about to happen soon? Thus, new legislation and the FHA playing a major role. Maybe a few savvy investors would "cherry pick" some desirable foreclosed mortgages, but for the most part, this would be extremely difficult to sort through millions of properties, unless one had an inside-track with government maintainers of these records, even to know where to look. This opens new doors for possible problems, if not outright curry favoring. It's a brotherhood thing, "doncha know"?
Since the government would now purchase the toxic mortgages "on the cheap" it can then resell them to interested home buyers, at a profit, or so it thinks. Of course, any profit would go back into the Treasury, (after expenses) to keep paying for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan , with newer military equipment.
Remember, these planned funds are to be borrowed against the American public taxpayer's full faith and accountability to be administered through the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) which collects the taxes, and in turn dolls it back to the Federal Reserve for "interest" repayment on the government loan. And, we are all to believe that a new round of tax increases are not on the horizon? Think again!
Except there's one major hitch. The government will not be "bailing out" corporations, such as GM, Ford, Chrysler, and many other major corporate players already about to implode, which will only result in untold thousands upon thousands of unemployed workers. And when other corporations begin to fail, so it goes for reduced consumer spending, or even ability to pay regular monthly bills. Worst yet, who will be able to qualify to purchase a new mortgage, regardless of the methodology Congress will provide through FHA lending practices? And, what effect will that now have on the banks?
What does this plan do to a recently declared solvent lenders? Why, of course, it causes yet more toxic debt! Is there any other outcome that could be expected? Back to the basics, the lenders are now handling toxic foreclosures once again for those who did get new mortgages. And they are running into trouble again, because there is no new mortgages; thus a lender's freeze. (Oh, the blow-torch again?)
Does the picture now widen? Of course it does. In fact, the picture is that it encircles much like a merry-go-round. And this carousel keeps running around in circles until the electrical plug is pulled, and suddenly grinds to a stop.It could happen sooner, rather than later.
Recessionary? You bet it is! Can it cause an economic disaster? One can only imagine the impact that begins by starting this vicious cycle of events.
While all of this is unfolding, nationwide unemployment is already at 7.5%. The number of existing foreclosures is nothing when compared to those already in pre-foreclosure, who soon will go into full foreclosure status. By a staggering 5 to 1 ratio over current foreclosures, and growing daily.
Want Evidence of this?
Some call this the "coming tsunami" that lurks in the shadows. Most have no clue as to the impact setting in the background already in pre-foreclosure status. A perfect example of this coming storm can be found at <http://Realtytrac.com>Realtytrac.com.
At that site, anyone can simply click on any zip code, then click on "maps" and get a startling revelation of just how many pre-foreclosures (blue flags) there are showing street by street, against a backdrop of already foreclosed homes (black flags), and see the ratios awaiting, for themselves.
Take a look at some of the hardest hit areas in California , Nevada , Florida and Michigan , as prime examples of just what is lurking in pre-foreclosures. The numbers are literally staggering. Take a real close look, and see if those blue flags doesn't give you the creepies of what is about to implode.
In case you may wonder just why these pre-foreclosures have not yet been determined to a foreclosed status, is largely due to the fact that the Circuit Courts are literally swamped with legal filings, and most do not even have the staff on hand to accommodate the daily filings, let alone more judges to handle the surge. That's the back log! And everyday the filings increase, as homeowners, unable to make that mortgage payment, walk away from their homes. Tent cities are springing up everywhere in the nation, not just "tent city" in California. Apartment complexes are raising the rent to make a better profit due to the surge in new apartment seekers. People are literally sleeping in cars, trucks, motor homes, travel trailers, by the thousands, anywhere they can. And by bailing out the major bankers, this will solve the problem? Or merely exacerbate it?
Back to Paulson and his blow torch. The question is will his plan work as he "hopes" it will, or will there be a further meltdown that would be unimaginable?
As the government leaders continue wrangling through the details over the weekend, it seems nobody is talking about any economic repercussions that could come from overseas investors, mainly China , among a dozen more. Moreover, little is mentioned anywhere about the American outrage that is going on at this very moment.
After-all, we all have to remember that most of our current debt owed to the FED, now some $9.4 trillion, is being covered by foreign investors, again China holding the lion's share, who, at any point, could change the course of economic events overnight. Already an article coming out of China news media strongly suggests it's country re-examine its financial position with the United States. And its not pretty.
The Treasury is broke, and the borrowing continues. Congress is likely to up the national debt to $11.5 trillion by next week. This unfathomable amount will likely never be repaid, not even in the next three generations.
Start thinking about the coming credit card and auto loan defaults, already on the horizon, and about to burst. And ask yourself, if Paulson's blow torch plan will really work, or if its just a small flicker from a match. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:17 am Post subject: Who Will Speak For Us? |
|
|
Who Will Speak For Us?
Jim Kirwan, 9-21-8
The short answer is "no one" because we have chosen to abstain from speaking for ourselves. As a result; the government no longer fears the people; so the people having chosen not to have a voice, are increasingly used and abused to further the takeover that has now become impossible to escape.
The government is saying among themselves, that this meltdown will encompass credit cards, student loans, all the pension funds, social security and virtually everything else including our non- existent jobs programs-not to mention the fact that we're looking at real job loses this year of over a million people. This is part of their defense for saddling the public with more than $11 TRILLION in debt, without any relief for the public that is expected to pay for this obscene crime.
When Ronald Reagan initiated the idea of "Morning in America" people had forgotten that he came to office from a failed governorship in California and from his stint on "Death Valley Days" both of which had more to do with his policies than anything like his vision of America as that "Shining City on the Hill." What Reagan instituted was "Greed is Good" and 'Americans ought to have whatever they want, no money down, and to hell with tomorrow,' (the core of that un-checked capitalism that created the housing-bubble).
One of the unspoken principle planks in the platform of Capitalism Inc. is that 'Yes there is a free-lunch, and that every citizen is entitled to it"! The second plank in un-regulated Capitalism is that congress and the laws are meaningless. And as the decades have passed what we see now where the congress used to be, is just a privileged compound apart from the public's real concerns, where a bunch of toothless mongrels prowl in luxury among themselves and bark incessantly at the shadows in the world, well beneath their lavish perks.
Now we come to a crisis the like of which the world has never seen before: Because this global event has dwarfed all other previous financial and political events, since those dark days when public records first began to be kept. The stand-in theorhetorically responsible for the Treasury who appeared this morning to be in the middle of a series of heart-attacks, keeps trying to tell the public that "We MUST do this quickly," despite the fact that he has no real numbers as to cost or duration! He has also assured the nation that there should be nothing in this for the taxpayers, those individuals who are expected to pay for these failures.
From Paulson we also learned that both parties plan to remain bi- partisan (no opposition from within the government), regarding this draconian step.
Paulson freely admits that there are many components to this massive failure brought on by several privately-held corporate and offshore interests that have FAILED, yet he sees his measure as the only way out of this global mess.
People might have forgotten that the entire premise for private- enterprise rests upon the risks that the so-called privatized- interests take, which include the right to fail, in order to remain free to profit hugely!
The right to FAIL is part of their sacred circle of rights that no one else can have-that is until they fail-bigtime-because then as now those same private companies then demand a bailout by none other than the public they so vastly screwed in the first place! To cap this all off, now the government is telling the public that we have no choice but to capitulate to these obscene demands-this is governance at the point of a gun, and this demands that we change the government according to the ideas laid out in the Declaration of Independence, which says in part:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. . ."
This so-called government in Washington no longer represents the people of this land, they only represent the corporations and the global interests of the ancient New World Order that seek to enslave Americans along with everyone else. In this case the idea is to create a fire-sale out of a once thriving economy in order to buy up what's left of this country at bargain prices, before they declare themselves the sole owners of the world. The second amendment was placed in the Constitution in order for the public to have the means to form militias that could take back the nation, if that ever became necessary. Apparently the time has come for the public to begin to give more than idle thought to this crisis that threatens to literally remake the entire structure of this nation and the world.
If the congress cannot put monetary and legal limits on this legislation, and if the congress and the White House are allowed to pass something that does not insure the survival of the general public which they shall have so freely and unconditionally taxed beyond all bounds of sanity: then we must have a revolution in the streets!
The government needs to come again, to fear the public, because they have proven beyond all doubt that they are unfit to lead anyone anywhere, ever again! Their list of on-the-record failures is staggering, and to any sentient being it is "unbelievable" even before they have added this final insult to the pending total collapse! "Capitalism must be checked, and leashed forever, so that these crimes can never-again be repeated in the public's name.
The laws on the books must be enforced, and everyone involved in creating this hijacking must have everything they own confiscated and go to jail at the very least: because to do less would be to encourage these new-old Robber-Barons to continue with business as usual.
Please remember: What is at stake is EVERYTHING monetary, all pensions, retirement funds, social security, credit cards, bank loans of any kind, not to mention the total lack of any funds for legitimate business costs or expansions-the jobs don't matter because they're gone already!
Offshore-anything must be heavily taxed or forbidden outright. No person with a hyphenated nationality ought to be allowed to hold any high office in this nation: at the very least our representative offices must be reserved for Americans only: and all foreign interest groups must be registered as such including AIPAC; that way whatever they do can be traced back to those who are directing their actions and their influence will at least be on-the- record.
The choice is simple, we must clean house because virtually everything that has been running everything, at the highest levels, is corrupt! If we can't do this, then we shall become the slaves that those on top, have now decided, that we should be! So either we find our long unused voices and our bodies to demand an end to all of this, or we shall set precedent, by caving in to tyranny at the point of those guns that we gave them with our long-held silence about everything they have done; both to us and to the rest of the planet! _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: Last major investment banks change status |
|
|
Last major investment banks change status
| Quote: | Becoming a bank holding company makes it easier for the firm to raise capital than if it remained a traditional bank. It can assume debt of shareholders on a tax free basis, borrow money, acquire other banks and non-bank entities more easily, and issue stock with greater ease. It also has a greater legal authority to repurchase its own stock once issued.
The downside includes greater levels of regulation, especially if there are more than 300 shareholders, at which point the bank holding company is forced to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There are also added expenses of operating with an extra layer of administration. This is usually offset by the fact that BHCs are often exempt from many of the state regulations and fees that a traditional bank would face. |
WASHINGTON - The Federal Reserve said Sunday it had granted a request by the country's last two major investment banks — Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley — to change their status to bank holding companies.
The Fed announced that it had approved the request of the two investment banks. The change in status will allow them to create commercial banks that will be able to take deposits, bolstering the resources of both institutions.
The change continued the biggest restructuring on Wall Street since the Great Depression.
The request for the change to bank holding companies was granted by a unanimous vote of the Fed's board of governors during a late Sunday meeting in Washington.
The change of status means both companies will come under the direct regulation of the Federal Reserve, which regulates the nation's bank holding companies. The banking subsidiaries of the two institutions will face the stricter regulations that commercial banks are required to meet. Previously, the primary regulator for Goldman and Morgan Stanley was the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Shares of both institutions had come under pressure ever since the bankruptcy filing last week by investment bank Lehman Brothers and the forced sale of investment bank Merrill Lynch to Bank of America.
Investors feared that the last remaining independent investment banks would not be able to survive in their current form. There had been speculation that both institutions would be acquired by commercial banks, whose ability to take deposits would give them a stable source of funding.
The decision by the two giants of finance to get approval from the Fed to change their own status represented another dramatic development in one of the most turbulent periods in Wall Street history.
In the surprise announcement late Sunday, the central bank said that to provide increase funding support to the two institutions during the transition period, they would be allowed to get short-term loans from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York against various types of collateral.
The Fed said its action would take final effect after a five-day waiting period required under law.
The decision means that the Goldman and Morgan Stanley will be able not only to set up commercial bank subsidiaries to take deposits, giving them a major resource base, but they will also have the same access as other commercial banks to the Fed's emergency loan program.
After the collapse of Bear Stearns and its forced sale to JP Morgan Chase last March, the Fed used powers it had been granted during the Great Depression to extend its emergency loans to investment banks as well as commercial banks. However, that extension was granted on a temporary basis.
But as commercial banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will have permanent access to emergency loans from the Fed, the same privilege that other commercial banks enjoy.
The action by the Fed's board of governors in Washington came on a day when the Bush administration continued to campaign for quick congressional approval of its request for authority to use $700 billion to purchase a mountain of bad mortgage debt held by financial companies. The effort represented the boldest action yet aimed at stabilizing chaotic financial markets.
Democrats in Congress said they would demand provisions in the bailout measure to protect people in danger of losing their homes as well as seeking to cap executive compensation at firms who get to unload their bad mortgages debt onto the government. But the proposal was expected to win quick congressional passage because both parties are concerned about the adverse reaction in financial markets should the measure look like it was being delayed. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:57 am Post subject: Almost Armageddon: Markets Were 500 Trades From Meltdown |
|
|
Almost Armageddon: Markets Were 500 Trades From Meltdown
NY Post
Sunday, Sept 21, 2008
The market was 500 trades away from Armageddon on Thursday, traders inside two large custodial banks tell The Post.
Had the Treasury and Fed not quickly stepped into the fray that morning with a quick $105 billion injection of liquidity, the Dow could have collapsed to the 8,300-level - a 22 percent decline! - while the clang of the opening bell was still echoing around the cavernous exchange floor.
According to traders, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, money market funds were inundated with $500 billion in sell orders prior to the opening. The total money-market capitalization was roughly $4 trillion that morning.
The panicked selling was directly linked to the seizing up of the credit markets - including a $52 billion constriction in commercial paper - and the rumors of additional money market funds "breaking the buck," or dropping below $1 net asset value.
The Fed's dramatic $105 billion liquidity injection on Thursday (pre-market) was just enough to keep key institutional accounts from following through on the sell orders and starting a stampede of cash that could have brought large tracts of the US economy to a halt.
While many depositors treat money market accounts as fancy savings accounts, they are different. Banks buy a variety of short-term debt, including commercial paper, with the assets. It is an important distinction because banks use the $1.7 trillion commercial-paper market to fund their credit card operations and car finance companies use it to move autos.
Without commercial paper, "factories would have to shut down, people would lose their jobs and there would be an effect on the real economy," Paul Schott Stevens, of the Investment Company Institute, told the Wall Street Journal.
Cracks started to show in money market accounts late Tuesday when shares in one fund, the Reserve Primary Fund - which touted itself as super safe - fell below the golden $1 a share level. It had purchased what it thought was safe Lehman bonds, never dreaming they could default - which they did 24 hours earlier when the 158-year-old investment bank filed Chapter 11.
By Wednesday, banks sensed a run on their accounts. They started stockpiling cash in anticipation of withdrawals.
Banks, which usually keep an average of $2 billion in excess reserves earmarked for withdrawals, pumped that up to an astounding $90 billion by Wednesday, Lou Crandall, chief economist at Wrighton ICAP, told The Journal.
And for good reason. By the close of business on Wednesday, $144.5 billion - a record - had been withdrawn. How much money was taken out of money market funds the prior week? Roughly $7.1 billion, according to AMG Data Services.
By Thursday, that level, fed by the incredible volume of sell orders pouring in from institutional investors like pension funds and sovereign funds, had grown to $100 billion. It was still not enough to stem the tidal wave.
The banks knew something drastic had to be done. So did Paulson.
The injection of capital into the market was followed up by calls from Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to major money market players like Bank of New York Mellon and State Street in Boston informing them that federal money was in the market and they should tell their clients the Feds would be back with a plan to stem the constriction in the credit market.
Paulson knew the $105 billion injection was not a real solution. A broader, more radical answer was needed.
Hours after Paulson made his round of calls to calm the industry, word leaked out that an added $1 trillion bailout of banks was being readied. Investors cheered. At about 3 p.m., news of the plans was filtering up and down Wall Street, fueling a 700-point advance in the Dow Jones industrial average through 4 p.m. Friday.
By that time, Paulson had announced the plan. It included insurance on money market accounts, a move that started in quiet Thursday morning, when the former Goldman Sachs executive saved the country from a paralyzing meltdown.
| Quote: | A $1.8 Trillion Bailout: Where the Money's Going
The U.S. Treasury Department is working through the weekend with Congress to craft a plan to spend as much as $700 billion to absorb bad mortgages and other assets from bank or other institution balance sheets to keep the financial system from collapsing.
The move comes close on the heels of an $85 billion Federal Reserve rescue of American International Group and the Treasury's takeover of housing finance firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac .
The Treasury plan, which follows a new federal guarantee for money market fund holdings, would push Washington's potential bailout tab to $1.8 trillion.
Following are details of actions, proposals and amounts:
—Up to $700 billion to buy assets from struggling institutions. The plan is aimed at sopping up residential and commercial mortgages from financial institutions but gives Treasury broad latitude.
—Up to $50 billion from the Great Depression-era Exchange Stabilization Fund to guarantee principal in money market mutual funds to provide the same confidence that consumers have in federally insured bank deposits.
—The Fed committed to make unspecified discount window loans to financial institutions to finance the purchase of assets from money market funds to aid redemptions.
—At least $10 billion in Treasury direct purchases of mortgage-backed securities in September. In doubling the program on Friday, the Treasury said it may purchase even more in the months ahead.
—Up to $144 billion in additional MBS purchases by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.The Treasury announced they would increase purchases up to the newly expanded investment portfolio limits of $850 billion each. On July 30, the Fannie portfolio stood at $758.1 billion with Freddie's at $798.2 billion.
—$85 billion loan for AIG, which would give the Federal government a 79.9 percent stake and avoid a bankruptcy filing for the embattled insurer. AIG management will be dismissed.
—At least $87 billion in repayments to JPMorgan Chase for providing financing to underpin trades with units of bankrupt investment bank Lehman Brothers . Paulson said over the weekend he was adamant that public funds not be used to rescue the firm.
—$200 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Treasury will inject up to $100 billion into each institution by purchasing preferred stock to shore up their capital as needed. The deal puts the two housing finance firms under government control.
—$300 billion for the Federal Housing Administration to refinance failing mortgage into new, reduced-principal loans with a federal guarantee, passed as part of a broad housing rescue bill.
—$4 billion in grants to local communities to help them buy and repair homes abandoned due to mortgage foreclosures.
—$29 billion in financing for JPMorgan Chase's government-brokered buyout of Bear Stearns in March. The Fed agreed to take $30 billion in questionable Bear assets as collateral, making JPMorgan liable for the first $1 billion in losses, while agreeing to shoulder any further losses.
—At least $200 billion of currently outstanding loans to banks issued through the Fed's Term Auction Facility, which was recently expanded to allow for longer loans of 84 days alongside the previous 28-day credits. |
_________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: U.S. Government's 'Aaa' Ratings Not Threatened |
|
|
Ha, ha, ha:
Moody's says U.S. government's 'Aaa' ratings not threatened
Market Watch, Sept. 22, 2008
The U.S. government's Aaa ratings are not threatened by the current highly challenging environment as the United States continues to display a robust level of economic and financial resilience, Moody's said Monday in a special report. "In recent weeks and months, the U.S. public authorities have been pursuing a bold and imaginative approach in their efforts to combat the financial crisis and the slowdown of the economy. In many cases, this has led to an expansion of the public sector balance sheet," said Pierre Cailleteau, managing director of Moody's sovereign risk unit. However, he added that allowing gross public debt to increase poses less of a risk to the rating than a deterioration in economic vitality. Moody's also noted the U.S. Treasury maintains an extremely high access to finance and that the possibility that its crisis management approach will fail to prevent the erosion of potential economic growth is very limited.
| Quote: |
Oil prices spiked more than $25 a barrel Monday — the biggest one-day price jump ever — as anxiety over the government's $700 billion bailout plan, a weak dollar and an expiring crude contract ignited a dramatic rally. |
 _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:22 am Post subject: The shadow banking system is unravelling |
|
|
The shadow banking system is unravelling
By Nouriel Roubini, September 21 2008, Financial Times
Last week saw the demise of the shadow banking system that has been created over the past 20 years. Because of a greater regulation of banks, most financial intermediation in the past two decades has grown within this shadow system whose members are broker-dealers, hedge funds, private equity groups, structured investment vehicles and conduits, money market funds and non-bank mortgage lenders.
Like banks, most members of this system borrow very short-term and in liquid ways, are more highly leveraged than banks (the exception being money market funds) and lend and invest into more illiquid and long-term instruments. Like banks, they carry the risk that an otherwise solvent but liquid institution may be subject to a selffulfilling and destructive run on its liquid liabilities.
But unlike banks, which are sheltered from the risk of a run – via deposit insurance and central banks’ lender-of-last-resort liquidity – most members of the shadow system did not have access to these firewalls that prevent runs.
A generalised run on these shadow banks started when the deleveraging after the asset bubble bust led to uncertainty about which institutions were solvent. The first stage was the collapse of the entire SIVs/conduits system once investors realised the toxicity of its investments and its very short-term funding seized up.
The next step was the run on the big US broker-dealers: first Bear Stearns lost its liquidity in days. The Federal Reserve then extended its lender-of-last-resort support to systemically important broker-dealers. But even this did not prevent a run on the other broker-dealers given concerns about solvency: it was the turn of Lehman Brothers to collapse. Merrill Lynch would have faced the same fate had it not been sold. The pressure moved to Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs: both would be well advised to merge – like Merrill – with a large bank that has a stable base of insured deposits.
The third stage was the collapse of other leveraged institutions that were both illiquid and most likely insolvent given their reckless lending: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, AIG and more than 300 mortgage lenders.
The fourth stage was panic in the money markets. Funds were competing aggressively for assets and, in order to provide higher returns to attract investors, some of them invested in illiquid instruments. Once these investments went bust, panic ensued among investors, leading to a massive run on such funds. This would have been disastrous; so, in another radical departure, the US extended deposit insurance to the funds.
The next stage will be a run on thousands of highly leveraged hedge funds. After a brief lock-up period, investors in such funds can redeem their investments on a quarterly basis; thus a bank-like run on hedge funds is highly possible. Hundreds of smaller, younger funds that have taken excessive risks with high leverage and are poorly managed may collapse. A massive shake-out of the bloated hedge fund industry is likely in the next two years.
Even private equity firms and their reckless, highly leveraged buy-outs will not be spared. The private equity bubble led to more than $1,000bn of LBOs that should never have occurred. The run on these LBOs is slowed by the existence of “convenant-lite” clauses, which do not include traditional default triggers, and “payment-in-kind toggles”, which allow borrowers to defer cash interest payments and accrue more debt, but these only delay the eventual refinancing crisis and will make uglier the bankruptcy that will follow. Even the largest LBOs, such as GMAC and Chrysler, are now at risk.
We are observing an accelerated run on the shadow banking system that is leading to its unravelling. If lender-of-last-resort support and deposit insurance are extended to more of its members, these institutions will have to be regulated like banks, to avoid moral hazard. Of course this severe financial crisis is also taking its toll on traditional banks: hundreds are insolvent and will have to close.
The real economic side of this financial crisis will be a severe US recession. Financial contagion, the strong euro, falling US imports, the bursting of European housing bubbles, high oil prices and a hawkish European Central Bank will lead to a recession in the eurozone, the UK and most advanced economies.
European financial institutions are at risk of sharp losses because of the toxic US securitised products sold to them; the massive increase in leverage following aggressive risk-taking and domestic securitisation; a severe liquidity crunch exacerbated by a dollar shortage and a credit crunch; the bursting of domestic housing bubbles; household and corporate defaults in the recession; losses hidden by regulatory forbearance; the exposure of Swedish, Austrian and Italian banks to the Baltic states, Iceland and southern Europe where housing and credit bubbles financed in foreign currency are leading to hard landings.
Thus the financial crisis of the century will also envelop European financial institutions. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Iran president blames Wall Street turmoil on U.S. 'military engagement'
September 23, 2008 , Los Angeles Times
NEW YORK -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declared today that the turmoil on Wall Street is rooted in part in U.S. military intervention abroad and voiced hope that the next American administration will retreat from what he called President Bush's "logic of force."
He also asserted, in an interview with The Times, that Israel is doomed "like an airplane that has lost its engine" and that Western intelligence documents questioning the peaceful purpose of Iran's nuclear program were crude forgeries.
The U.N. General Assembly opened its fall session today in a state of alarm over a global financial crisis. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he feared a "serious negative impact" on his effort to secure increased pledges this week from rich nations to aid the poorest, which are already reeling from increases in food and energy prices.
Before joining the annual fall debate, Ahmadinejad sounded a provocative note on the topic during a 40-minute interview with Times editors and a reporter in a Midtown Manhattan hotel suite heavily guarded by agents of the Department of Homeland Security.
"Problems do not arise suddenly," he said. "The U.S. government has made a series of mistakes in the past few decades. The imposition on the U.S. economy of the years of heavy military engagement and involvement around the world . . . the war in Iraq, for example. These are heavy costs imposed on the U.S. economy.
"The world economy can no longer tolerate the budgetary deficit and the financial pressures occurring from markets here in the United States, and by the U.S. government," he added.
Several blocks away, across from the U.N. headquarters, 3,000 demonstrators mobilized by a coalition of mostly Jewish groups protested against Ahmadinejad's threats toward Israel and Iran's human rights record.
And in Vienna, the U.N. arms control chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, accused Iran of blocking his efforts to clarify its involvement in experiments and studies consistent with developing a clandestine nuclear weapons program.
Suspicion that Iran is pursuing such weapons took center stage at last fall's General Assembly debate and put Ahmadinejad on the spot. This year, with a divided U.N. Security Council reluctant to tighten sanctions against Iran, he appeared relaxed and confident.
"We do not believe that the U.S. policy perspective, looking at the rest of the world as a field of confrontation, will give good results," he said.
The Iranian leader wore a gray windbreaker over a light brown shirt and a Pierre Cardin belt in his gray plaid slacks. He smiled almost incessantly, even when talking about his nemesis, Bush, whose policies, he said, "have harmed people all around the world."
He declined to say whether he preferred to confront a Republican administration led by John McCain, who opposes negotiating with Iran, or a Democratic one headed by Barack Obama. Obama says he would talk to Ahmadinejad's government under certain conditions.
Nor did he, despite prodding in the interview, suggest a fresh approach by Iran to Bush's successor.
"Any [U.S.] government that comes to power must change previous policy approaches," he said, adding that he was ready to speak with either of the candidates while he's in New York this week. "We're interested in having friendly relations." _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: US Treasuries: Will foreign investors remain buyers? |
|
|
US Treasuries: Will foreign investors remain buyers?
| Quote: | | Could this be the turn in the bond market? The relief rally following the promised $700bn ($538bn) clean-up of Wall Street’s toxic waste lasted barely more than a trading day. Foreign investors may finally be cottoning on that they are bailing out Uncle Sam. With bonds and shares falling – and oil shooting up – this could get nasty. |
Daily Telegraph, 23 Sep 2008
For most of this month, Treasury bond prices rose on the theory that, in the midst of a crisis, they were a safe haven. But, as Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke have approved a bewildering array of ever more far-rearching bailouts, investors started adding up the numbers.
Depending how you account for the quasi-nationalisations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the total cost is now well over $1 trillion – and possible several trillion dollars.
If Uncle Sam was rich, this might not matter too much. But the government’s deficit is already yawning as the result of a slowing economy. On conservative estimates, it will reach $450bn next year. It doesn't take a dire assumption to think it could top $1tr by 2010.
What’s more, the country as a whole is still relying on funds from abroad to finance its trade gap. The current account deficit is running at $60bn a month, a cool $720bn annually
From an international investor’s perspective, this is beginning to look worrying. Last week they were receiving a yield of only 3.4pc for holding US government paper for 10 years. Even if inflation comes back under control and hovers around 3pc, that doesn’t look like much compensation. Something more like 5pc-6pc would be reasonable. If inflation starts to take off – and Monday’s astonishing 12pc spike in oil prices is not a comforting omen – a reasonable bond yield would be still higher.
In the past week, the dollar has fallen by 3pc on a trade-weighted index while the price of 10-year Treasuries have dropped 4pc. Put these together and foreign buyers of have suffered a 7pc loss.
The real worry is that there could be a stampede for the exits as they try to cash out before suffering even bigger losses. The Federal Reserve might then be forced into the unpleasant task of pushing up interest rates in the midst of a crisis. _________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Site Admin
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 887
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject: Bernanke Signals U.S. Should Pay More for Bad Debt |
|
|
| Quote: | Paulson will be granted immunity for how he distributes the money:
Sec. 8. Review.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
Latest version:
(2) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize the public disclosure of information that is—
(A) specifically prohibited from disclosure by any other provision of law;
(B) specifically required by Executive order to be protected from disclosure in the interest of national defense or national security or in the conduct of foreign affairs; or
(C) a part of an ongoing criminal investigation. |
Bernanke Signals U.S. Should Pay More for Bad Debt
Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke signaled that the government should buy devalued assets at above-market values to make its proposed $700 billion rescue package most effective in combating the financial crisis.
``Accounting rules require banks to value many assets at something close to a very low fire-sale price rather than the hold-to-maturity price,'' Bernanke said in testimony to the Senate Banking Committee today. ``If the Treasury bids for and then buys assets at a price close to the hold-to-maturity price, there will be substantial benefits.''
Bernanke's remarks, an unusual departure from his prepared testimony, come as lawmakers and the Bush administration negotiate a rescue plan aimed at easing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The Fed chief said paying prices higher than the bad assets would fetch in the open market would help ``unfreeze'' credit markets and aid the economy.
| Quote: |
SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE TROUBLED ASSETS.
(a) OFFICES; AUTHORITY.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary is authorized to establish a program to purchase, and to make and fund commitments to purchase troubled assets from any financial institution, on such terms and conditions as are determined by the Secretary, and in accordance with policies and procedures developed by the Secretary.
...
SEC. 21. DEFINITIONS.
(7) TROUBLED ASSETS.—The term ‘‘troubled assets’’ means—
(A) residential or commercial mortgages, and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case were originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008; and
(B) upon the determination of the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, any other financial instrument, as the Secretary determines necessary to promote financial market stability.
The Treasury Morphs Into A Hedgefund
With a capital of $700 billion and the authority to buy and sell any highly leveraged financial instruments, the Treasury will become one gigantic hedge fund that can and may well act to move multi-trillions. |
_________________ Crom Alternative Currency System
Crom Alternative News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|